Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the addition made by substituting the actual sale consideration of unlisted shares with fair market value under section 50D was sustainable when the consideration was ascertainable and the shares were sold under an identifiable commercial transaction.
Analysis: Section 48 requires capital gains to be computed on the full value of consideration received or accruing on transfer. Section 50D applies only where such consideration is not ascertainable or cannot be determined, so that the machinery for computation otherwise fails. On the facts, the share sale consideration was identifiable from the transaction documents and was actually received at negotiated prices between unrelated parties. The record did not show that the consideration was indeterminable or that there was any legal basis to replace the stated consideration with a notional fair market value. The subsequent introduction of section 50CA could not govern the year in question.
Conclusion: The substitution of the actual sale price by fair market value under section 50D was not justified, and the addition on account of capital gains was deleted in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the transfer consideration is ascertainable, section 50D cannot be invoked to replace the actual consideration with fair market value, and capital gains must be computed under section 48 on the basis of the real sale consideration unless a specific statutory deeming provision applies.