Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2022 (3) TMI 1668 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Search assessment principles: completed years need incriminating material, and unaccounted sales must be estimated on a realistic net profit basis. In search assessments under section 153A of the Income-tax Act, completed years cannot be disturbed without incriminating material, so additions for ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Search assessment principles: completed years need incriminating material, and unaccounted sales must be estimated on a realistic net profit basis.

                          In search assessments under section 153A of the Income-tax Act, completed years cannot be disturbed without incriminating material, so additions for assessment years 2010-11 to 2013-14 were deleted. For later years, unaccounted sales were accepted on seized material, but income was required to be estimated on a net profit basis reflecting unrecorded s; the 4% rate was reduced to 1.55%. Additions for gold and cash incentive expenditure, alleged unaccounted cash sales, unexplained cash, notional interest on unsecured loans, surrendered income, and specified domestic transaction adjustments were deleted where they rested on loose papers, uncorroborated statements, duplication, or a provision that had ceased to operate.




                          Issues: (i) whether additions for unaccounted sales for the non-abated assessment years 2010-11 to 2013-14 could be sustained in proceedings under section 153A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 in the absence of incriminating material; (ii) whether the estimation of unaccounted sales for the assessment years 2014-15 to 2016-17 was to be upheld and, if so, whether gross profit or net profit rate was the proper basis; (iii) whether additions on account of gold and cash incentive expenditure were sustainable; (iv) whether the addition for alleged unaccounted cash sales in assessment year 2015-16 and the addition for unexplained cash in assessment year 2016-17 were sustainable; and (v) whether the additions for notional interest on unsecured loans and surrendered income were sustainable.

                          Issue (i): whether additions for the non-abated assessment years 2010-11 to 2013-14 could be sustained in the absence of incriminating material.

                          Analysis: The search yielded no incriminating material relatable to these completed assessments. The additions were based on extrapolation from material pertaining to later years, without any independent defect in books or evidence of excess production, stock, or out-of-books sales for these years. In proceedings under section 153A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, completed assessments can be interfered with only on the basis of incriminating material found during search.

                          Conclusion: The additions for assessment years 2010-11 to 2013-14 were unsustainable and were rightly deleted in favour of the assessee.

                          Issue (ii): whether the estimation of unaccounted sales for the assessment years 2014-15 to 2016-17 was to be upheld and, if so, whether gross profit or net profit rate was the proper basis.

                          Analysis: The seized material for these years established unaccounted sales, so estimation on that basis was justified. However, the income could not be computed on gross profit alone because the undisclosed sales would necessarily involve unrecorded expenses as well. The Court treated the assessee's disclosed net profit history as a more realistic benchmark and found that a 4% rate was excessive.

                          Conclusion: The estimation of unaccounted sales was upheld, but the additions were to be recomputed by applying 1.55% net profit rate, in favour of the assessee to that extent and against it to the extent that unaccounted sales were sustained.

                          Issue (iii): whether additions on account of gold and cash incentive expenditure were sustainable.

                          Analysis: The relied-upon seized papers were treated as loose sheets and rough jottings without independent corroboration. No cross-examination was granted in relation to the adverse statements, and the same documents could not be used to tax sales on one hand and ignore the expenditure noted therein on the other. Once net profit was adopted, separate addition for such incentive expenditure would distort the computation.

                          Conclusion: The additions on account of gold and cash incentive expenditure were deleted in favour of the assessee.

                          Issue (iv): whether the addition for alleged unaccounted cash sales in assessment year 2015-16 and the addition for unexplained cash in assessment year 2016-17 were sustainable.

                          Analysis: The cash-sales addition for assessment year 2015-16 was found to relate to sales already recorded in the books, and no excess cash was found. The addition for alleged unexplained cash in assessment year 2016-17 rested on third-party statements recorded without cross-examination and without corroborating seized material. Such statements could not be used against the assessee in the absence of confrontation and supporting evidence.

                          Conclusion: Both additions were deleted in favour of the assessee.

                          Issue (v): whether the additions for notional interest on unsecured loans and surrendered income were sustainable.

                          Analysis: The notional interest additions were based on presumption without evidence that such interest was actually earned. The addition for surrendered income was duplicative because the surrendered amount had already been offered to tax in the return and was linked to the same cash-loan issue. The transfer-pricing adjustment based on specified domestic transaction was also held unsustainable after omission of the relevant clause in section 92BA of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

                          Conclusion: The notional interest additions and the surrendered-income addition were deleted or remanded as held in favour of the assessee, and the transfer-pricing adjustments were deleted in favour of the assessee.

                          Final Conclusion: The non-abated search-year additions failed for want of incriminating material, the search-year estimation was restricted to a lower net profit basis, and most ancillary additions based on loose papers or uncorroborated statements were deleted, leaving the revenue's appeals dismissed and the assessee's relief substantially sustained.

                          Ratio Decidendi: In search assessments under section 153A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, completed assessments can be disturbed only on the basis of incriminating material found during search, and where undisclosed sales are established, income must be estimated on a realistic basis that accounts for unrecorded expenses and rests on corroborated evidence rather than conjecture.


                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found