Section 153C jurisdiction fails without express satisfaction linking seized material to the other person's total income.

Section 153C requires a recorded satisfaction note to expressly show that the seized material belongs to, pertains to, or relates to the other person and has a bearing on the determination of that person's total income. Where the satisfaction note omits this statutory nexus, the defect is a substantive jurisdictional infirmity and not a curable technical lapse. On that basis, the Tribunal held that initiation of proceedings under section 153C was not supported by valid satisfaction, and the assessment was invalid and unsustainable.

---

---

Issues: Whether the assessment framed under section 153C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was valid in the absence of a satisfaction note expressly recording that the seized material had a bearing on the total income of the other person.

Analysis: For invoking section 153C, the recorded satisfaction must clearly show that the seized documents or material belong to, pertain to, or relate to the other person and that such material has a bearing on the determination of that person's total income. The satisfaction note relied upon did not expressly record this statutory requirement. The Tribunal treated this omission as a substantive legal infirmity rather than a curable technical lapse and held that the initiation of proceedings under section 153C was not supported by a valid satisfaction. The defect went to the root of jurisdiction and vitiated the assessment.

Conclusion: The section 153C assessment was held invalid and unsustainable; the assessee succeeded and the Revenue failed.

Ratio Decidendi: A satisfaction note under section 153C must expressly demonstrate the statutory nexus between the seized material and the determination of the other person's total income, failing which the resulting assessment is vitiated for want of jurisdiction.

---