Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the customs authorities had any lawful power to seize and retain the sale proceeds received by the petitioner from another licensed money changer, and whether the impugned action could be sustained under the Customs Act.
Analysis: The transaction was between authorised foreign exchange dealers, and the purchaser's licence as a money exchange dealer was not disputed. The Court held that the provisions relating to confiscation of goods or their proceeds were inapplicable because no import, export, or smuggled goods were involved. Section 121 could not be invoked in the absence of smuggled goods, and the suggested course of awaiting adjudication did not cure an action that was prima facie unwarranted and illegal.
Conclusion: The seizure and retention of the petitioner's money were not justified under the Customs Act, and the amount was directed to be released forthwith in favour of the petitioner.