Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Disallowance of expenditure relating to exempt income under section 14A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and the applicability of Rule 8D of the Income-tax Rules, 1962.
Analysis: The assessee had earned exempt income from dividends and interest on bonds and had itself made a suo motu disallowance towards expenses relatable to such income. The Assessing Officer applied Rule 8D and made a higher disallowance, which was sustained in appeal. The Tribunal noted that in the assessee's earlier years, identical disallowance had been examined and the administrative expenditure component worked out under Rule 8D had been restricted having regard to the nature of investments in bonds and securities. Following that consistent view in the assessee's own case for earlier assessment years, the Tribunal held that the disallowance under section 14A should be confined to a reasonable figure and that the assessee should get credit for the amount already disallowed suo motu.
Conclusion: The disallowance was restricted to Rs. 12 lakhs under section 14A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, with benefit of the suo motu disallowance already made by the assessee, and the balance addition was deleted.