Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether disallowance of deduction could be made within the scope of adjustment under section 143(1)(a) for the relevant assessment year. (ii) Whether interest income earned from deposits with co-operative banks was eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(d).
Issue (i): Whether disallowance of deduction could be made within the scope of adjustment under section 143(1)(a) for the relevant assessment year.
Analysis: The adjustment provisions under section 143(1)(a), as applicable to the relevant year, did not extend to making the impugned disallowance under Chapter VI-A on the ground invoked by the revenue. The broader disallowance mechanism relied upon was introduced only from a later assessment year by amendment, and therefore was not available for the year in question.
Conclusion: The adjustment under section 143(1)(a) was not permissible for the relevant assessment year and was deleted in favour of the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether interest income earned from deposits with co-operative banks was eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(d).
Analysis: Section 80P(2)(d) grants deduction in respect of interest or dividend derived by a co-operative society from investments with any other co-operative society. The judgment treats a co-operative bank as falling within the expression co-operative society for this purpose and distinguishes authorities dealing with idle surplus funds or the different language of section 80P(2)(a)(i). On that basis, the interest received from co-operative banks qualified for deduction.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to deduction under section 80P(2)(d), and the disallowance on merits was set aside in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The order gave full relief to the assessee by holding both that the impugned prima facie adjustment was not sustainable for the relevant year and that the interest income from co-operative banks remained deductible under the provision governing co-operative society investments.
Ratio Decidendi: For the relevant assessment year, a disallowance not specifically covered by the then-operative scope of section 143(1)(a) could not be made as a prima facie adjustment, and interest earned by a co-operative society from investments with a co-operative bank is deductible under section 80P(2)(d) because the bank is treated as a co-operative society for that purpose.