Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether cranes used for lifting and moving materials in the factory qualify as capital goods eligible for modvat credit, i.e., whether such handling equipment is part of the manufacturing process for the notified finished goods.
Analysis: The question turns on the scope of capital goods under the modvat scheme and whether equipment whose primary function is lifting and handling is sufficiently connected with production or processing of the notified finished goods. Prior authority establishes that handling may amount to processing when the manufacturing of the final product would not be possible without that handling. The scheme must be read to give relief against cascading duty and the use of capital goods must be considered in or in relation to manufacture. Where it is shown that the equipment is essential to the manufacturing stream-i.e., without its use the final product cannot be manufactured-the equipment falls within the scope of capital goods for modvat purposes. The Tribunal applied this test to the admitted factual position that the cranes lift and move materials necessary to the manufacturing process and relied on remand jurisprudence only where factual determination of essentiality was required.
Conclusion: The benefit of modvat credit in respect of the cranes is allowed; the appeals by the revenue are dismissed and the decision below allowing modvat credit is upheld in favour of the assessee.