Suspension of customs broker licence not justified where regulator failed to record immediate need to restrain operations.

The article examines suspension of a customs broker licence under Regulation 16, holding that suspension requires the licensing authority to be satisfied of an immediate need to restrain the broker's operations pending inquiry; the suspension relied on alleged failures under duties but improperly treated valuation as the broker's responsibility despite valuation being within the customs valuation framework; because the order did not record the requisite satisfaction of immediate necessity, continuation of suspension was unjustified and the impugned suspension was set aside in favour of the appellant.

---

---

Issues: Whether continuation of suspension of the customs broker licence under Regulation 16 of the Customs Broker Licensing Regulations, 2018 was justified pending further investigation.

Analysis: Regulation 16 authorises suspension of a customs broker licence where the licensing authority is satisfied of an immediate need to restrain operations pending inquiry. The impugned order relied on investigation reports alleging nondischarge of duties under Regulation 10(d), 10(e), 10(m) and 10(q). However, the regulatory scheme does not require a customs broker to determine valuation of goods; valuation and reassessment are functions of the proper officer under the customs valuation framework. The adjudicating authority did not record satisfaction of the specific requirement of an immediate need to stop the broker's operations as mandated by Regulation 16. In consequence, the factual and legal basis stated in the suspension order was inadequate to sustain continued suspension pending completion of investigations.

Conclusion: The continuation of the suspension of the customs broker licence under Regulation 16 of the Customs Broker Licensing Regulations, 2018 is not justified on the record; the impugned suspension order is set aside and the appeal is allowed in favour of the appellant.

---