Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under Section 271(1)(b) and Section 272A(1)(d) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for alleged non-compliance with notices should be sustained where the assessment was ultimately completed under Section 143(3) accepting the return and the taxpayer subsequently complied, citing bonafide delay due to the Covid-19 pandemic.
Analysis: The assessment proceedings show initial non-compliance with notices but subsequent compliance by the taxpayer and completion of assessment under Section 143(3) (including proceedings under Section 153C/153A where applicable). The legal framework treats Section 271(1)(b) and Section 272A(1)(d) as penalties for non-compliance with statutory notices; however, a series of authorities establish that where the assessing authority proceeds to pass an assessment under Section 143(3) after receiving the taxpayer's explanations and documents, such subsequent compliance may be treated as adequate and the earlier default may be ignored. The facts include a contemporaneous bonafide reason for delay (severe Covid-19 pandemic) and eventual full compliance leading to acceptance of return, factors which weigh against imposing penalty.
Conclusion: Penalties imposed under Section 271(1)(b) and Section 272A(1)(d) are deleted; the appeals are allowed in favour of the assessee.