Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the addition made on account of cash deposits during the demonetisation period was justified and whether the deletion of such addition by the first appellate authority called for interference.
Analysis: The assessee produced bank certificates showing that no demonetised currency had been deposited in the bank accounts. The returned income stood accepted and the turnover was treated as accepted in principle. The first appellate authority had also undertaken a detailed examination of the assessee's claim before granting relief. On these facts, the addition made by the Assessing Officer lacked merit.
Conclusion: The deletion of the addition was upheld and the Revenue's challenge was rejected.
Final Conclusion: The appellate relief granted to the assessee was sustained and the Revenue's appeal failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where bank records and surrounding material establish that deposits were not made in demonetised currency and the assessee's results are otherwise accepted, an addition based solely on suspicion regarding cash sales during demonetisation is not justified.