Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the respondents' inaction in not disposing of the rectification application dated 26.12.2019 and in not processing grant of refund/credit of pre-paid taxes following a merger (effective date fixed by a tribunal order) is maintainable and what relief, if any, should be granted.
Analysis: The merger was effected pursuant to an order of the National Company Law Tribunal with retrospective effect; a prior writ of similar nature was disposed by the Court on the basis that challan migration from the transferor to the transferee had been completed. In the present matter, departmental action at the Hyderabad office is complete but migration for one merged entity falls to be carried out by the Circle-III office in Chennai for technical reasons; the Department has represented that migration is being pursued and will take time. Given the identical factual and legal matrix to the earlier disposed matter and the limited remaining step of migration at the specified Circle-III office, continued pendency was not warranted and a time-bound direction was appropriate to ensure finalization of rectification and processing of any refunds.
Conclusion: Writ petition disposed with a direction to respondent No.1 to finalize the rectification application within eight weeks and to process and finalize any refund claims expeditiously; subject to successful migration, the petitioner is entitled to claim refunds/credits in accordance with law.