Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the imported goods described as "Access Point/(Multiple Input/Output (MIMO) product)" are classifiable under CTH 85176290 or CTH 85176990; (ii) Whether the appellant is eligible for exemption under Notification No. 57/2017 in respect of the impugned goods.
Issue (i): Classification of the imported goods as CTH 85176290 or CTH 85176990.
Analysis: The Tribunal examined prior practice, earlier rulings including the Tribunal's own final and rectification orders, foreign customs rulings relied on by the appellant, and the requirements of tariff classification based on specific headings, chapter and section notes and the General Rules of Interpretation of the Tariff and HSN. The Tribunal considered whether the department had made out a case to revise classification and whether subsequent notifications could be applied retrospectively to change past classification.
Conclusion: The impugned goods are held classifiable under CTH 85176290 in accordance with the Tribunal's prior findings and accepted practice; the department's attempt to reclassify to CTH 85176990 is not sustained.
Issue (ii): Entitlement to exemption under Notification No. 57/2017 for the impugned goods.
Analysis: The Tribunal analysed the scope of the exclusion clause in the notification, focusing on the conjunctive wording "Multiple Input/Multiple Output (MIMO) and Long Term Evolution (LTE) Products", and applied principles of statutory construction on the use of 'and' versus 'or'. The Tribunal relied on earlier decisions including its own orders which found that the exclusion applies only to products having both MIMO and LTE, and on the Tribunal's rectification clarifying eligibility for the exemption under Notification No. 57/2017.
Conclusion: The appellant is entitled to the exemption benefit under Serial No. 20 of Notification No. 57/2017 for the goods classified under CTH 85176290.
Final Conclusion: The appeals are allowed; the classification of the impugned goods is affirmed as CTH 85176290 and the appellant is eligible for exemption under Notification No. 57/2017, with consequential relief as per law.