Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income tax Act, 1961 can be sustained where the notice issued under section 274 of the Income tax Act, 1961 alleged both limbs of section 271(1)(c) (i.e. concealment of income and furnishing inaccurate particulars) without specifying which limb was relied upon.
Analysis: Section 274 notice must specify the particular limb of a provision alleged to have been violated when the provision contains more than one limb, so as to apprise the assessee of the specific allegation and enable a focused explanation with supporting documents. The notice dated 08.12.2015 referred to both limbs of section 271(1)(c)-"concealed particulars of income" and "furnished inaccurate particulars of income"-without indicating which limb was the basis for initiating penalty proceedings. This omission prevented the assessee from knowing the precise allegation and caused prejudice to the assessee's ability to defend against the charge. The defect in the notice is material to the validity of the penalty proceedings and renders the penalty order vulnerable to set aside.
Conclusion: The notice under section 274 was defective for not specifying the particular limb of section 271(1)(c) relied upon; consequently, the penalty order under section 271(1)(c) and the appellate order confirming it are set aside in favour of the assessee.