Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment/reassessment framed under section 144 read with section 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is valid where notice under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was not served on the assessee.
Analysis: The Tribunal examined records showing the notice under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was issued to an address different from the assessee's PAN database address and found no evidence of service of notices under sections 148 or 142(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal noted that service of the notice is a mandatory jurisdictional requirement before making assessment/reassessment under section 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and that the assessing officer proceeded to pass an order under section 144 r.w.s. 147 in the absence of proof of service. The Tribunal further observed that the first appellate authority did not decide the jurisdictional ground but recorded facts contrary to the record regarding compliance with the notices; on the established record the notices remained unserved.
Conclusion: The assessment order passed under section 144 r.w.s. 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is quashed for non-service of the mandatory notice under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961; decision in favour of the assessee.