Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicants should be granted waiver of pre-deposit of the penalty amount or, alternatively, be required to deposit a reduced portion of the penalty in view of their asserted poor financial condition.
Analysis: The applicants sought complete exemption from pre-deposit on the ground that the company is non-functional, has no material assets and its loan account is declared NPA, and one individual applicant asserted lack of managerial control and inability to pay. The respondent opposed complete waiver, alleging asset siphoning and contending that no full exemption should be granted. The decision weighs the parties' competing claims about present financial incapacity and the need to secure the penalty amount during the appellate process.
Conclusion: The applicants are not granted full waiver; they are directed to deposit 10% of the penalty amount within six weeks as a condition for interim relief.