Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether assessment and penalty proceedings initiated and completed under sections 147/148 and 271F of the Income-tax Act, 1961 against a company that stood dissolved/struck off prior to issuance of jurisdictional notice are valid.
Analysis: The issues examined whether the assessing officer invoked jurisdiction and framed assessment in the name of a corporate entity that had been struck off and dissolved under section 560(3) of the Companies Act, 1956 with effect from 04.06.2012, and whether such proceedings can sustain additions under section 69A or penalty under section 271F. The decision applies the principle that an entity which has ceased to exist cannot be the subject of a fresh jurisdictional notice and assessment; reliance is placed on precedent holding that framing assessment against a non-existent entity is a jurisdictional defect and that reopening in the name of a dissolved entity is invalid. The Tribunal quashed the reassessment order made on 21.12.2018 and, consequent to quashing of the assessment, held that the penalty levied under section 271F does not survive.
Conclusion: The reassessment framed under sections 147/148 and the consequential penalty under section 271F are quashed and cancelled; the appeals are allowed in favour of the assessee.