Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the assessment should be restored to the Assessing Officer for de novo assessment because the order under Section 142(2A) was passed without affording a reasonable opportunity of being heard.
Analysis: The ITAT examined whether the statutory precondition of affording a reasonable opportunity of being heard before invoking Section 142(2A) was complied with and found that the proceedings did not show that a sufficient opportunity to reply and to be heard was granted. On that basis the ITAT concluded that the order under Section 142(2A) was vitiated and remanded the matter for de novo assessment, keeping all rights and contentions open to both sides. The High Court reviewed the ITAT's limited factual and procedural finding that the assessee had been denied a reasonable opportunity of hearing and observed that because the ITAT remanded for fresh assessment and kept all contentions open, no substantial question of law arises at that stage; the High Court directed the Assessing Officer to proceed in accordance with the ITAT's order and disposed of the appeals.
Conclusion: The matter is remanded to the Assessing Officer for framing a de novo assessment after affording the assessee a reasonable opportunity of being heard; the ITAT's order remanding the assessment is upheld and the appeals are disposed of accordingly.