Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioners are entitled to file appeals against the default assessment orders dated 6.2.2012 and 1.9.2011 by raising the contention that the orders were not uploaded on their portal and were therefore not served, with consequent non-application of limitation.
Analysis: The Court records competing factual assertions regarding service and upload of the assessment orders. The petitioners assert non-upload and non-service; respondents assert upload. The Court observes that the petitioners may raise the non-upload/non-service contention before the appellate authority and that any plea that limitation does not bar the appeal for that reason must be considered and examined by the appellate authority in accordance with law.
Conclusion: The petitioners are permitted to file appeals against the orders dated 6.2.2012 and 1.9.2011 and to contend that the orders were not uploaded or served so as to defeat the limitation defence; such contentions shall be examined by the appellate authority in accordance with law. The writ petitions are disposed of in favour of the petitioners.