Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the writ petition challenging forfeiture of earnest money and the e-auction process should be proceeded with or may be withdrawn with liberty to approach the concerned department for relief.
Analysis: The petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition which challenges forfeiture of earnest money deposited pursuant to an e-auction and alleges contravention of departmental guidelines. The e-auction pre-dates the impugned circular relied upon by the petitioner. The sale was conducted on an "as is where is" basis with an obligation on the purchaser to inspect the goods. The petition was instituted after a delay of approximately five years. The request to withdraw the petition is not opposed by the revenue.
Conclusion: The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach the concerned department for relief; the department is at liberty to pass an order as per law after hearing the petitioner.