Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the High Court could, in revision against an order of discharge, grant an ex parte stay of the discharge and direct the discharged accused to surrender to custody.
Analysis: The revisional powers under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 permit suspension of an impugned order and, in an appropriate case, the exercise of appellate powers including Section 390. However, an order of discharge has the effect of releasing the person from the status of an accused, and a stay of such an order has the consequence of reviving criminal process and curtailing liberty. Such a drastic interim order is not to be granted mechanically or ex parte, and can be made only in rare and exceptional cases after hearing the discharged accused. Where the purpose is securing presence pending revision, the proper course is to resort to bail-type safeguards under Section 390 rather than committing the discharged person to custody. An ex parte stay of the discharge order, followed by a direction to surrender, was therefore impermissible.
Conclusion: The ex parte stay and the consequential custody direction were illegal and liable to be quashed, and the discharged accused was entitled to relief.
Ratio Decidendi: In revision against discharge, an ex parte stay of the discharge order cannot be granted except in rare and exceptional cases after hearing the accused, and the revisional court should ordinarily secure attendance by bail-type conditions rather than by directing custody.