Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether ad-interim protection should be granted pending consideration of the compounding application in respect of alleged offences under Chapter II of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
Analysis: The Court granted rule and, at the interim stage, protected the petitioners by staying the filing of any prosecution and restraining the respondents from taking steps prejudicial to personal liberty in relation to the alleged excise offences connected with the pending compounding application. The order also required the petitioners to cooperate and remain present when required.
Conclusion: Ad-interim relief was granted in favour of the petitioners.