Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2023 (1) TMI 1510 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Off-market share purchase and sale claiming s.10(38) exempt LTCG treated as bogus; s.68 cash credit and s.69C upheld. The dominant issue was whether claimed exempt long-term capital gains under s.10(38) from share transactions were genuine, or liable to be treated as ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Off-market share purchase and sale claiming s.10(38) exempt LTCG treated as bogus; s.68 cash credit and s.69C upheld.

                            The dominant issue was whether claimed exempt long-term capital gains under s.10(38) from share transactions were genuine, or liable to be treated as unexplained cash credits under s.68. The ITAT held that the shares across all relevant years were purchased off-market and the taxpayer failed to explain how it identified or accessed such shares; in the absence of any material contradicting the appellate authority's findings, the adverse inference of non-genuineness was sustained, and the s.10(38) exemption was denied with the s.68 addition upheld. Separately, as the underlying transactions were treated as accommodation entries, the addition under s.69C for alleged commission to entry providers was upheld, resulting in dismissal of all appeals.




                            ISSUES PRESENTED AND CONSIDERED

                            1. Whether the claimed exempt long-term capital gains from sale of shares could be treated as non-genuine and consequently brought to tax as unexplained cash credits under section 68, with denial of exemption under section 10(38).

                            2. Whether the addition for alleged commission paid to entry/exit providers in relation to the impugned share transactions was sustainable as unexplained expenditure under section 69C.

                            ISSUE-WISE DETAILED ANALYSIS

                            Issue 1: Denial of section 10(38) exemption and addition under section 68 for alleged bogus long-term capital gains

                            Legal framework: The Court examined the disallowance of exemption under section 10(38) and consequential taxation of the credited sale proceeds/claimed gains as unexplained credits under section 68, based on findings that the underlying share transactions were not genuine.

                            Interpretation and reasoning: The Court accepted the concurrent factual findings that the assessee's gains arose from penny stock transactions marked by abnormal and unjustified price rise, insignificant financials/net worth of the companies, and indicators of price manipulation/artificial rigging. For one scrip, the Court relied on the regulator's final findings of manipulative trades by concerned entities connected with the scrip, supporting the inference of a colourable device to generate artificial gains. For another scrip, even though the regulator's final findings did not hold the assessee guilty of manipulation, the Court held that independent adverse material gathered during assessment-such as failed third-party verifications, unserved notices, and responses denying transactions and alleging misuse of identity details-remained uncontroverted and supported the conclusion of non-genuineness. For the remaining scrips, the Court emphasized negligible business activity and absence of financial justification for extreme appreciation. The Court further noted that the shares were purchased off-market and the assessee provided no evidence explaining how such shares were identified/available, reinforcing the inference against genuineness. The plea that transactions were routed through demat accounts and through banking channels was held insufficient, in the given facts, to establish genuineness.

                            Conclusions: The Court upheld denial of exemption under section 10(38) and sustained the additions under section 68 across the relevant years, holding that the impugned long-term capital gains were not genuine and represented unexplained credits.

                            Issue 2: Addition of alleged commission under section 69C

                            Legal framework: The Court considered whether commission allegedly paid for arranging the non-genuine long-term capital gains entries was taxable as unexplained expenditure under section 69C.

                            Interpretation and reasoning: Having affirmed the finding that the share transactions were accommodation/colourable in nature, the Court treated the consequential inference of commission to entry/exit providers as justified. With the core transaction being held non-genuine and no contrary material produced to rebut the assessment findings, the Court found no basis to interfere with the commission addition sustained by the appellate authority.

                            Conclusions: The Court upheld the addition under section 69C on account of commission paid to the entry provider, and dismissed the assessee's grounds on this aspect.


                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found