Anti-dumping duty review requires examination of domestic plant closure and continuation of bond-based imports pending fresh review.

Where anti-dumping duty is under review, the Designated Authority may examine the factual basis for continuing the duty, including whether closure of the only domestic manufacturer was caused by dumping and whether that closure occurred before or after the investigation. The Court set aside the impugned order and remitted the matter for fresh review, including consideration of whether any withdrawal could operate from 2 February 1999. Pending that review, the existing arrangement allowing import of fused magnesia against duly executed bonds was continued.

---

---

Issues: Whether the impugned order should be set aside and the matter remitted to the Designated Authority for review of the continuation of anti-dumping duty, including consideration of the factual basis for withdrawal from 2 February 1999, and what interim arrangement should operate pending such review.

Analysis: The parties agreed that the order could be set aside without reasons. The Court nevertheless noted the contention that the closure of the only Indian manufacturer of sintered magnesia may bear upon the justification for continuing anti-dumping duty. Relying on Rule 23, the Court indicated that the Designated Authority should examine the factual position, including whether the factory closure was a consequence of dumping and whether the closure occurred before or after the investigation. The Court also directed consideration of whether continuation of anti-dumping duty was justified in the circumstances and whether any withdrawal could operate from 2 February 1999. Pending the review, the existing arrangement permitting import of fused magnesia against duly executed bonds was ordered to continue.

Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remitted to the Designated Authority for review, with the appeals disposed of in terms of those directions.

Final Conclusion: The decision left the merits of the anti-dumping duty controversy open, while restoring the matter to the Designated Authority for a fresh review and maintaining the bond-based import arrangement in the interim.

Ratio Decidendi: Where anti-dumping duty is under review, the designated authority may examine the factual basis for continuation of the duty and the consequences of closure of domestic production within the scope of the limited review power.

---