Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported goods were correctly classifiable under Customs Tariff Item 8471 4190 as automatic data processing machines, and whether the benefit of Basic Customs Duty exemption under Notification No. 24/2005-Cus. dated 01.03.2005 was available, or whether the goods were classifiable under Customs Tariff Item 9504 9090.
Analysis: The dispute turned on the proper classification of the imported goods in light of Chapter Note 5(A) to Chapter 84 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 and the rival stand that the goods functioned as toys for children. The Tribunal noted that an earlier decision involving the same respondent and similar goods had already upheld classification under Chapter 84 and rejected the departmental shift to heading 9503/9504. It held that no different view could be taken on the same issue, and that the classification adopted by the respondent remained sustainable. Consequent to that classification, the claimed customs duty exemption also survived.
Conclusion: The classification under heading 8471 was upheld and the Revenue's challenge failed.