Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the writ petition seeking quashing of the provisional assessment notice under Rule 12(1) of the Central Sales Tax (Orissa) Rules, 1957 could succeed on the basis of an earlier order quashing a notice under Rule 12(4) of the said Rules on limitation, and whether the existence of an appealable remedy warranted interference under writ jurisdiction.
Analysis: The earlier order had quashed a notice issued under Rule 12(4) of the Central Sales Tax (Orissa) Rules, 1957 for the same tax period on the ground of limitation under Rule 12(4)(e). The present challenge, however, was directed against a notice for provisional assessment under Rule 12(1), which is a different statutory provision and operates in a different field. The Court found that the earlier quashing order did not automatically govern the present notice merely because the assessment period was the same. It also noted that the provisional assessment under Rule 12(1) was appealable and that the petitioner had approached the writ court instead of pursuing the statutory appellate remedy.
Conclusion: The challenge to the provisional assessment notice was not accepted, and the writ petition was held not to merit interference.
Final Conclusion: The Court declined writ relief because the impugned action arose under a distinct provision from the one earlier set aside, and the petitioner had an available statutory appeal against the provisional assessment.
Ratio Decidendi: A notice for provisional assessment under Rule 12(1) of the Central Sales Tax (Orissa) Rules, 1957 is not vitiated merely because an assessment notice for the same period under Rule 12(4) was earlier quashed on limitation; where a statutory appellate remedy exists, writ interference is unwarranted.