Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner's bank account was liable to be de-frozen and permitted to be operated, while protecting the disputed amount and ensuring cooperation with the investigating agencies.
Analysis: The parties agreed that the account need not remain fully frozen during the pendency of investigation. The Court accepted the consensus and directed that the account be released for operation, while safeguarding the amount of Rs.43,254/- stated to be involved in the disputed fraudulent transaction. The petitioner was required to cooperate with the bank authorities and investigating agencies and to keep the account open until permitted otherwise. The Bank was also left free to transfer the disputed amount to the account from which it had been credited.
Conclusion: The bank account was directed to be de-frozen and made operable, subject to freezing of the disputed amount and the petitioner's continued cooperation with the investigation.