Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioners were liable to penal action for transferring and availing unutilised Modvat credit from one unit to another after an order permitting such transfer had become final.
Analysis: The unutilised credit had been permitted to be transferred by an order of the Deputy Commissioner under Rule 57AF(1) and (2) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. That order was not challenged by the department and had attained finality. The permission could not be read as being subject to a further condition that credit transfer was impermissible unless inputs or goods were also transferred. In the circumstances, the petitioners' transfer and availment of credit was in accordance with the subsisting order, and no contravention warranting penal proceedings could be made out.
Conclusion: The show cause notice proposing penal action was unsustainable and was quashed; the issue was decided in favour of the assessees.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an unchallenged order expressly permits transfer of unutilised credit under the applicable excise rules, the department cannot later initiate penal proceedings on a contrary construction of the same order.