Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2023 (6) TMI 1516 - HC - IBC

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        E-auction sale consideration dispute over buyer's delay in paying balance; liquidator to accept only by deadline with costs The dominant issue was whether the liquidator could be directed to accept the petitioner's balance sale consideration under the e-auction/letter of intent ...
                          Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
                            Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

                                E-auction sale consideration dispute over buyer's delay in paying balance; liquidator to accept only by deadline with costs

                                The dominant issue was whether the liquidator could be directed to accept the petitioner's balance sale consideration under the e-auction/letter of intent terms despite the petitioner's non-compliance. The HC noted that relevant auction clauses indicated the petition was not wholly untenable, but held that the impasse was attributable to the petitioner and had led to unnecessary consumption of judicial time. Consequently, the HC directed the liquidator to receive the balance sale consideration only if paid on or before the stipulated date, and made the relief conditional upon payment of costs, to be deposited with the State Legal Services Authority; the writ petition was disposed of on those terms.




                                1. ISSUES PRESENTED AND CONSIDERED

                                (i) Whether the Court should direct the liquidator to accept the balance sale consideration from the highest bidder in an e-auction, despite a pending clarification application before the adjudicating authority, so that the sale can be concluded within the stipulated 90-day period and the bidder does not suffer forfeiture consequences.

                                (ii) What conditions, timelines, and consequential directions (including costs and issuance of sale certificate) should govern such acceptance of the balance consideration to ensure adherence to the e-auction terms.

                                2. ISSUE-WISE DETAILED ANALYSIS

                                Issue (i): Direction to liquidator to accept balance sale consideration within the contractual timeline

                                Legal framework: The Court proceeded on the admitted and operative e-auction sale conditions and the letter of intent, including the stipulated requirement that the sale be concluded within 90 days from the auction, and on the parties' concessions/consent placed before the Court.

                                Interpretation and reasoning: The Court treated the material facts as undisputed: the petitioner was the highest bidder, deposited 25% as required, and the balance was due within 90 days, with the last date falling on 18.06.2023. The petitioner's doubts and request for clarifications led to the liquidator moving an application before the adjudicating authority, which remained pending, creating a practical risk that the petitioner could lose the deposit if the sale was not completed within time. The liquidator's counsel fairly conceded the 90-day deadline and expressed willingness to receive the balance amount if directed. The petitioner, through counsel and in-court instructions, undertook to pay the entire balance by the next day and to seek no concessions, agreeing to abide by the auction conditions. Considering the predicament to both sides and the avoidable burden of redoing the sale exercise, the Court accepted the consensual resolution, while noting that the situation was brought about by the petitioner and had consumed judicial time.

                                Conclusion: The Court directed the liquidator to receive the balance sale consideration, provided it is paid on or before 18.06.2023.

                                Issue (ii): Conditions, timelines, costs, and consequence of default; issuance of sale certificate

                                Legal framework: The Court relied on the sale conditions and the letter of intent as governing documents for payment timelines and completion of sale, and exercised discretion to impose costs in view of the petitioner's role in creating the situation.

                                Interpretation and reasoning: To preserve the integrity of the auction terms while granting relief, the Court made its direction conditional upon payment within the stipulated deadline. It expressly provided that if payment is not made by 18.06.2023, the petitioner will not get the benefit of the order. The Court also accepted the petitioner's volunteered cost of Rs. 2,00,000/- to be deposited with the Karnataka State Legal Services Authority within two weeks, reflecting the Court's view that valuable judicial time had been expended due to the petitioner's conduct. Further, to ensure completion of the transaction upon timely payment, the Court directed that the liquidator shall issue the sale certificate within one week after receipt of the full balance sum as indicated in the letter of intent.

                                Conclusion: Relief was granted subject to (a) payment of the balance on or before 18.06.2023, failing which the order confers no benefit; (b) deposit of costs of Rs. 2,00,000/- with the Karnataka State Legal Services Authority within two weeks; and (c) issuance of the sale certificate by the liquidator within one week of timely receipt of the balance consideration.


                                Full Summary is available for active users!
                                Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                                Topics

                                ActsIncome Tax
                                No Records Found