Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the reopening notice and the assessment and consequential orders founded on sanction under the wrong limb of section 151 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 were liable to be quashed.
Analysis: The petition related to Assessment Year 2017-18. The parties accepted that the issue of improper sanction was covered by the earlier decision holding that, on the facts of the relevant assessment year, sanction ought to have been granted under section 151(ii) and not under section 151(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. On that basis, the sanction was invalid and the notice issued on its strength could not survive. Any assessment order and other consequential orders passed pursuant to such invalid sanction were also liable to be set aside.
Conclusion: The notice, assessment order and all consequential notices and orders were quashed and set aside.