Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the reassessment notice and the assessment framed beyond four years from the end of the relevant assessment year were valid when the recorded reasons did not identify any failure by the assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for assessment.
Analysis: The original assessment had been completed under section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, after the return, financial statements and inventory details were already before the Assessing Officer. The reasons for reopening relied on the same material available in the original proceedings and did not specify what material facts had been withheld by the assessee. In a case governed by the first proviso to section 147, reassessment after four years is permissible only if income has escaped assessment by reason of the assessee's failure to make a return or to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for assessment. Since the recorded reasons did not satisfy that statutory condition, the reopening was treated as a mere change of opinion and lacked jurisdiction.
Conclusion: The reassessment notice under section 148 and the consequential assessment were held invalid and liable to be quashed; the assessee succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: Where reassessment is initiated beyond four years, the recorded reasons must expressly demonstrate the assessee's failure to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for assessment, and reopening on the basis of material already available in the original assessment is impermissible as a mere change of opinion.