Interim bail protection continued where compliance and regular appearance justified making the arrangement absolute during trial.

Interim bail protection was continued where the petitioner had complied with the direction to appear before the Trial Court, furnished bail bonds to its satisfaction, and was regularly attending and cooperating with the trial. On that factual basis, the interim arrangement was made absolute and the petitioner was permitted to remain on regular bail during the pendency of trial, subject to continued appearance on each hearing date unless exempted and compliance with the Trial Court's conditions.

---

---

Issues: Whether the interim protection earlier granted to the petitioner should be made absolute and the petitioner be permitted to remain on bail during the pendency of the trial.

Analysis: The petitioner had complied with the earlier direction to appear before the Trial Court, had been admitted to interim bail, had furnished bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, and was stated to be regularly appearing and cooperating with the trial. In these circumstances, the interim arrangement warranted continuation on the same terms, with the petitioner remaining bound to appear before the Trial Court on each hearing date unless exempted and to comply with the conditions imposed by the Trial Court.

Conclusion: The interim order was made absolute and the petitioner was directed to remain on regular bail during the pendency of the trial subject to compliance with the stipulated conditions.

---