Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Sufficient material found for forming opinion under Section 241(2) on directors' nomination; pro forma respondents deleted</h1> <h3>Atul Dev & Ors. Versus Union of India & Ors.</h3> The SC upheld that sufficient material existed for formation of opinion under Section 241(2) of the Companies Act, 2013 and noted NCLAT's finding that the ... Nomination of 15 number of persons as Directors in General Committee of Delhi Gymkhana Club Limited. - Section 241-242 of the Companies Act, 2013 - conditions precedent for invoking provisions of Section 241(2) of the Companies Act, 2013 - formation of opinion by the Central Government under Section 241(2) - conduct of affairs of the Company in proper way or not - sufficient materials on the record for formation of requisite opinion - it was held by NCLAT that 'Requisite conditions precedent within the meaning of Section 241(2) of the 2013 Act in the application filed by the Union of India under Section 241-242 are met.' HELD THAT:- Application for deletion of proforma Respondent Nos. 4 to 19 is allowed at the risk and cost of the petitioners - Issue notice to Respondent No. 3 returnable in six weeks. 'I.A. No. 12584 of 2025, Application for deletion of proforma Respondent Nos. 4 to 19 is allowed at the risk and cost of the petitioners.' Counsel on caveat for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 accepted notice and 'waive[d] service.' The Court directed that notice be issued to Respondent No. 3, returnable in six weeks. Procedural disposition: deletion of specified proforma respondents granted subject to petitioners bearing associated risk and costs; caveat counsels' acceptance obviated formal service for Respondent Nos. 1-2; further proceedings towards Respondent No. 3 are fixed on a six-week returnable timeline.