Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the transfer petitions seeking transfer of the criminal trial under Section 406 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 were maintainable on the ground of a reasonable apprehension that a fair and impartial trial would not be possible in the State of Punjab.
Analysis: Transfer of a criminal case is warranted only when the apprehension of injustice is reasonable and not based on conjecture or mere allegation. The governing test is whether, on the totality of circumstances, public confidence in the fairness of the trial would be seriously undermined and whether transfer is necessary for the ends of justice. On the materials placed, the Court found that the trial court was competent to conduct a fair trial, that the apprehension expressed was not reasonable, and that transfer at that stage would also prejudice the prosecution, the accused, and the witnesses.
Conclusion: The request for transfer was rejected; the petitioners failed to establish a reasonable apprehension of denial of justice.
Final Conclusion: The criminal trial was directed to continue before the existing trial court, as no ground was made out for transfer in exercise of the Supreme Court's power under Section 406.
Ratio Decidendi: A criminal case may be transferred only when the party seeking transfer shows a reasonable, objective apprehension of denial of a fair trial; a mere allegation or subjective fear is insufficient.