TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Special Leave Petition against the High Court's order should be entertained despite a gross unexplained delay of 248 days and whether interference on merits is warranted.
Analysis: The petition was examined on the twin grounds of delay and merits. The Court found a gross delay of 248 days in filing the Special Leave Petition and remained unconvinced by the explanation offered for the delay. Independently, the Court found no reason to interfere with the impugned High Court order on merits and therefore declined to exercise its discretionary jurisdiction under Article 136 to admit the petition.
Conclusion: The Special Leave Petition is dismissed on the grounds of inordinate unexplained delay (248 days) and on merits.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
