TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appeal dismissed; delay condonation refused under Section 14 Limitation Act, exclusion of May 22-Oct 16, 2024 upheld</h1> <h3>B.D. Agarwal Versus Stressed Assets Stabilization Fund & Anr.</h3> B.D. Agarwal Versus Stressed Assets Stabilization Fund & Anr. - TMI Having heard counsel and perusal of the materials on record, the Court found 'no reason to interfere with the impugned order passed by the High Court.' The Court therefore dismissed the Civil Appeal: 'The Civil Appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.' All pending applications, including the application for impleadment, were directed to 'stand disposed of.' The decision rests on the appellate court's determination that the High Court's order warranted no intervention on the present record; no further factual or legal disturbance of the impugned order was made. Procedurally, the appeal is conclusively disposed and ancillary motions raised before the Court require no separate resolution.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
