Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the ex parte order deserved to be recalled on the ground that the assessee had sufficient cause for non-appearance and had not been afforded a proper and adequate opportunity of hearing.
Analysis: The assessee sought recall of the ex parte order under Rule 24 of the Income Tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 1963 read with section 254 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, explaining that no notice of the subsequent hearing was received and that the absence was not deliberate. The Tribunal accepted the explanation and found sufficient reason for the non-appearance. It further held that the assessee had not been given a proper and adequate opportunity to present and substantiate the case.
Conclusion: The ex parte order was recalled and the appeal was restored for fresh hearing before the Regular Bench. The miscellaneous application was allowed.