TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>NCLAT dismisses recall application under Rule 11 of NCLAT Rules 2016 for attempting re-argument without review powers</h1> <h3>Baiju Trading and Investment Pvt. Ltd. Versus Arihant Nanavati, Liquidator & Ors.</h3> The NCLAT Principal Bench dismissed an application seeking recall of order under Rule 11 of NCLAT Rules 2016. The Tribunal held that the applicant was ... Recalling of order - Rule 11 of the NCLAT, Rules 2016 - HELD THAT:- As a matter of fact, in the garb of this application, the Applicant is trying to re-argue the matter which is not permissible because the power of review does not vest with this Tribunal as it is not provided in the Code. The present application is hereby dismissed. The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi, in an order dated 29.03.2023, dismissed the application filed under Rule 11 of the NCLAT Rules, 2016 seeking recall of the said order. The Tribunal held that 'the power of review does not vest with this Tribunal as it is not provided in the Code,' and therefore, the application was an impermissible attempt to re-argue the matter. Consequently, the application was dismissed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
