Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under Section 51(7)(b) of the Punjab Value Added Tax Act, 2005 was sustainable where the goods were voluntarily reported at the information collection centre and were covered by stock transfer documents showing undervalued particulars.
Analysis: The goods were reported at the information collection centre, and the record showed that they had been purchased against tax-paid invoices and were being moved as stock transfer for sales promotion purposes. The documents and accompanying material indicated that the transaction was not a sale in Punjab and that the declared value did not reflect an intention to evade tax. In the circumstances, the detaining authority was required to confine itself to the limited scope of proceedings under Section 51, and the record did not justify treating the matter as one involving concealment or tax evasion. The impugned penalty orders were therefore held to be unsustainable.
Conclusion: The penalty under Section 51(7)(b) could not be sustained, and the assessee succeeded.