TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the VAT department was bound to issue the requisite C forms or F forms to the petitioners despite the pendency of an appeal before the Supreme Court.
Analysis: The issue had already been conclusively decided in favour of the petitioners in earlier binding decision of the Court. The pendency of the special leave appeal did not suspend that decision, as no stay had been granted by the Supreme Court. In the absence of a stay, the department remained bound to comply with the existing directions.
Conclusion: The petitioners were entitled to issuance of the requisite C forms or F forms, and the department was directed to comply accordingly.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
