TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Delhi VAT Department Must Issue Tax Forms Within 3 Weeks Under Binding Order Requiring Immediate Compliance</h1> <h3>REXCIN PHARMACEUTICALS PRIVATE LIMITED, JENUS TRADERS INDIA, INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED, AERO CLUB, PRATHAM MFG. WORKS, PANACEA BIOTEC LTD., GOBIND RAM SURENDER KUMAR Versus COMMISSIONER, VALUE ADDED TAX, THE COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES & ANR.</h3> HC ruled in favor of petitioners, directing Delhi VAT Department to issue 'C' or 'F' forms within three weeks. Supreme Court granted leave on SLP without ... Failure by the Respondent DVAT Department to issue 'C' form or 'F' form or both - HELD THAT:- The Court has seen the order dated 27th March, 2017 passed by the Supreme Court i the above SLP. While by the said order leave has been granted and the matter has been fixed for final hearing in the month of July 2017, there is no stay granted of the decision of this Court. The DVAT Department is bound to comply with the binding directions issued by the Court in Ingram Micro India Pvt. Ltd. [2016 (2) TMI 244 - DELHI HIGH COURT]. These writ Petitions are accordingly disposed of in terms of the decision of this Court in Ingram Micro India Pvt. Ltd. by directing that the DVAT Department will issue to each of the Petitioners, depending on their specific prayer, the requisite 'C' form or 'F' form or both as the case may be. The Delhi High Court, through Justices S. Muralidhar and Najmi Waziri, addressed writ petitions concerning the Delhi VAT Department's failure to issue 'C' or 'F' forms. The Court reaffirmed its earlier ruling in Ingram Micro India Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner, Department of Trade & Taxes (2016) 89 VST 312 (Del), which resolved the issue in favor of the petitioners. Although the DVAT Department filed a Special Leave Petition (SLP) No. 295 of 2017 in the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court granted leave but did not stay the High Court's decision. Consequently, the DVAT Department is 'bound to comply with the binding directions' of the High Court. The Court ordered the Department to issue the requisite 'C' or 'F' forms to the petitioners within three weeks, subject to any indemnity bond requirement communicated within two weeks. The petitions were disposed of accordingly.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
