Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether 'C' Forms could be directed to be issued for the financial year 2012-13 despite the expiry of the time limit for revising the dealer's return under the applicable VAT law.
Analysis: The return for the relevant period had not reflected the transactions, and the prescribed period for filing a revised return had expired under the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004. The fact that the purchasing entity was a GNCTD undertaking did not alter its position as an assessee bound by the same statutory regime as any other dealer. The Court accepted that the petitioner suffered because of the failure to disclose the transactions and to seek timely correction, but held that the petitioner could not compel the tax authorities to issue 'C' Forms after the lapse of the statutory period. At the same time, the Court followed the course adopted in earlier similar matters and directed issuance of forms, with that direction kept in abeyance pending the outcome of the connected appeals before the Supreme Court.
Conclusion: The Court held that the limitation under the VAT law could not be ignored, but nevertheless directed release of the 'C' Forms, subject to suspension until the Supreme Court decides the pending civil appeals.