Supreme Court Rejects Special Leave Petition After Petitioner's Concession in Related Case, Finding No Substantial Merit SC dismissed the SLP after noting the petitioner's concession in a related case (Union of India vs. Rajeev Bansal). The Court condoned delay and found no ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Supreme Court Rejects Special Leave Petition After Petitioner's Concession in Related Case, Finding No Substantial Merit
SC dismissed the SLP after noting the petitioner's concession in a related case (Union of India vs. Rajeev Bansal). The Court condoned delay and found no merit in the petition, disposing of it without further consideration, with Justices Nagarathna and Sharma presiding.
The Supreme Court, with Hon'ble Justices B.V. Nagarathna and Satish Chandra Sharma presiding, addressed a Special Leave Petition. After hearing counsel for the petitioner and noting the absence of representation for the respondent, the Court "condoned delay." Relying on the concession made by the petitioner-Department in a related case, Union of India vs. Rajeev Bansal, Civil Appeal No. 8629 of 2024, the Court held that the Special Leave Petition "would not survive for further consideration." Consequently, the Court "dismissed" the petition and disposed of any pending applications.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.