Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicant was entitled to regular bail in a prosecution under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, having regard to the statutory restrictions under Section 45 and the material collected during investigation.
Analysis: The application was considered in the context of the twin requirements under Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, namely, whether there were reasonable grounds for believing that the applicant was not guilty and whether he was likely to commit an offence while on bail. The material on record was assessed on broad probabilities at the bail stage. The applicant's admitted travel to Dubai, his admitted meetings with the principal accused, the bank-account transactions said to be linked with routing of proceeds of crime, and the allegations concerning acquisition of property in the name of his wife were treated as circumstances prima facie connecting him with the alleged laundering activity. The Court found that the statements and financial material were sufficient at this stage to indicate involvement, and that the applicant had not made out a case satisfying the statutory threshold for grant of bail.
Conclusion: Bail was declined and the application was rejected.