Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for the purposes of the declaration obligation and penal consequences under the Gold (Control) Act, 1968, the weight of pearls, stones and similar fittings embedded in gold ornaments is to be excluded while computing the statutory threshold.
Analysis: The Act defines "gold" and "ornament" broadly, and expressly includes ornaments set with stones, gems and pearls. Section 16 imposes a declaration obligation in respect of gold articles and ornaments owned or possessed, and the exemption provision is confined to the limited field expressly carved out by the statute. Neither the charging and regulatory scheme nor the definitional provisions provide for deduction of the weight of stones, pearls or other attachments when determining the aggregate weight for the statutory threshold. The exemption cannot be enlarged by implication, particularly in a penal statute regulating possession and declaration of gold ornaments.
Conclusion: The weight of pearls and stones forms part of the ornament for the purposes of the Act, and the question is answered in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a statute regulating gold ornaments defines ornament to include items set with stones or pearls, the total weight of the ornament is to be taken as held, without deducting such embedded materials, unless the Act expressly provides otherwise.