Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the addition of share capital received by the assessee was justified under section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, when the assessee failed to establish the identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of the investor.
Analysis: The assessee received share capital of Rs. 25 lakhs from another company but could not furnish confirmation or otherwise substantiate the investor's existence, financial capacity or the genuineness of the transaction. The mere fact of amalgamation did not discharge the assessee's burden to prove the source and nature of the credit. The findings of the lower authorities that the assessee failed to discharge the initial onus were upheld.
Conclusion: The addition under section 68 was sustained and the assessee's challenge was rejected.
Final Conclusion: The assessment addition relating to share capital remained undisturbed and the appeal failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an assessee cannot prove the identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of a share capital credit, the amount is liable to be treated as unexplained cash credit under section 68.