TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Bank Account Freed: Attachment Expired Under CGST Act, Court Orders Unrestricted Access to Petitioner's Account</h1> <h3>AASHNA SINGHAL Versus PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF GST</h3> The Delhi HC ruled in favor of the petitioner, determining that the provisional attachment of the bank account under the Central Goods and Services Tax ... Challenge to attachment order passed under Section 83 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 - expiry of one year from the date the order is made - HELD THAT:- It is held that the provisional attachment of the Bank Account No. 5318491022934019 with Yes Bank Ltd. in the name of petitioner has ceased to have effect. Petition allowed. The Delhi High Court, in a case involving an attachment order under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, provisionally attached a bank account belonging to the petitioner. The petitioner argued that the provisional attachment should cease after one year as per the Act. It was acknowledged that no fresh attachment order had been issued after the initial one on 27-1-2022. Consequently, the court allowed the petition, ruling that the provisional attachment of the bank account had expired. The respondent bank was directed to allow the operation of the account without any restrictions based on the provisional attachment order. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
