Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in the absence of a constituted Appellate Tribunal under the Bihar Goods and Services Tax Act, the petitioner was entitled to the statutory benefit of stay of recovery on deposit of the prescribed amount, and whether the appeal would have to be filed once the Tribunal becomes functional.
Analysis: The writ petition was filed to secure the appellate remedy under Section 112 of the Bihar Goods and Services Tax Act, which could not be effectively invoked because the Tribunal had not been constituted. The order referred to the statutory framework under Sections 107 and 112, and the removal-of-difficulties notification issued under Section 172, under which limitation for filing appeal before the Tribunal would commence only after the President or State President enters office. To balance equities, the Court directed that upon deposit of 20% of the remaining disputed tax, the petitioner would receive the statutory stay contemplated by Section 112(9), and the recovery steps would be treated as stayed. The Court further directed that the appeal must be filed before the Tribunal once it is constituted and made functional.
Conclusion: The petitioner was granted conditional stay of recovery and consequential protection under Section 112 of the Bihar Goods and Services Tax Act, with the obligation to file the appeal before the Tribunal after its constitution.