Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interference with the High Court order was called for and whether the Competition Commission of India could be restrained from proceeding with the enquiry and investigation on the ground of lack of jurisdiction.
Analysis: The Competition Commission of India is an independent authority empowered to examine alleged contraventions under the Competition Act, 2002. Once it forms a prima facie opinion and initiates proceedings, such action cannot be treated as wholly without jurisdiction. The proceedings under the Act are also intended to be dealt with expeditiously, and the petitioners' contentions were directed to remain open before the Commission for consideration in accordance with law.
Conclusion: No interference with the impugned order was warranted, and the Competition Commission of India was not to be restrained from proceeding further with the enquiry or investigation.