Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the trial court, after passing a decree which had attained finality, retained jurisdiction to entertain applications under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and direct police protection and mutation of katha in favour of the decree-holder.
Analysis: Once the decree had been passed and had attained finality, the trial court became functus officio. Its jurisdiction thereafter was confined only to correction of clerical or arithmetical mistakes within the limited scope of Sections 152 and 153 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The impugned directions for police protection and for issuance of katha in respect of agricultural land went beyond that limited jurisdiction and could not be sustained. In the exercise of supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, such orders were liable to be corrected.
Conclusion: The impugned orders were without jurisdiction and were quashed; the writ petitions succeeded.