Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the tenant had shown sufficient cause under Section 11(4) of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 for not depositing the arrears and continuing rent within time so as to avoid eviction for default.
Analysis: Section 11(1) requires a tenant facing eviction for rent default to deposit all arrears and continue to pay current rent during the proceedings. Section 11(4) permits relief only if the tenant shows sufficient cause for non-deposit. The expression "sufficient cause" requires sincerity, bona fide conduct, reasonableness, and absence of negligence or inaction. On the facts, the tenant neither deposited the rent within the time fixed nor moved the Controller for relief on the footing of a genuine inability to comply. Instead, the tenant denied the landlord-tenant relationship and did not maintain the monthly deposits required by law. The later deposit made before the appellate authority was only to meet the statutory requirement for hearing the appeal and did not establish bona fides or sufficient cause.
Conclusion: The tenant did not establish sufficient cause for the default in deposit of arrears and current rent. The eviction order was sustainable and the tenant's challenge failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Relief from eviction for non-deposit of rent can be granted only when the tenant proves bona fide, reasonable and unavoidable cause for non-compliance with the statutory deposit obligation.