ITAT allows pension provisions and banking deductions while dismissing depreciation appeals and remanding foreign branch issues

The ITAT Mumbai ruled on multiple issues in a banking case. The tribunal allowed pension provision deductions as ascertained liabilities based on actuarial valuation, following Metal Box Co. precedent. It dismissed appeals on depreciation for matured securities and leased assets, upholding lower authorities' decisions. The tribunal allowed deductions under section 36(1)(vii) for non-rural advances and section 36(1)(viia) for standard assets. Interest income from NPAs was deleted as no credit entry existed in books. The tribunal allowed provisions for wage revision and staff welfare expenses. Issues regarding foreign branch income taxation were decided against the assessee. Several matters including LSE chair payment and foreign asset depreciation were remanded for fresh adjudication. The tribunal directed computation of section 14A disallowance only for investments yielding exempt income during the year.

---

---

Issues Involved:

1. Disallowance of provision for pension.
2. Depreciation on matured securities.
3. Disallowance under section 14A.
4. Depreciation on leased assets.
5. Deduction under section 36(1)(vii) for non-rural advances.
6. Depreciation on securities.
7. Deduction under section 36(1)(viia) for standard assets.
8. Taxation of interest on Non-Performing Assets (NPAs).
9. Taxation of Non-Performing Investments (NPIs).
10. Contribution to Retired Employees Medical Benefit Scheme.
11. Double taxation relief.
12. Payment for setting up a chair in London School of Economics.
13. Recovery of bad debts written off in earlier years.
14. Non-taxability of income from foreign branches.
15. Taxability of interest on securities.
16. Allowability of broken period interest.
17. Allowability of provision for wage revision.
18. Allowance of staff welfare expenses.
19. Disallowance under section 14A r/w Rule 8D.
20. Loss on revaluation of investments in HTM category.
21. Allowance of depreciation on foreign assets.
22. Set off of loss of erstwhile State Bank of Saurashtra.
23. Discount on Employee Stock Purchase Scheme.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Disallowance of Provision for Pension: The Tribunal allowed the assessee's claim for provision for pension, following the precedent set in the assessee's own case for the assessment year 2008-09. It was held that the provision for pension is an ascertained liability and should be allowed as a deduction under section 37(1) of the Act.

2. Depreciation on Matured Securities: The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of depreciation on matured securities, following the decision in the assessee's own case for the assessment year 1996-97. It was held that the depreciation claim was not allowable as the securities were not impaired.

3. Disallowance under Section 14A: The Tribunal deleted the disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(ii) as the assessee's own funds exceeded the investments. However, it directed the AO to exclude stock-in-trade and strategic investments while computing disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(iii).

4. Depreciation on Leased Assets: The disallowance of depreciation on leased assets was upheld, following the decision in the assessee's own case for the assessment year 1996-97, where it was treated as a finance lease.

5. Deduction under Section 36(1)(vii) for Non-Rural Advances: The Tribunal allowed the deduction for non-rural advances, following the Supreme Court's decision in the case of The Catholic Syrian Bank Ltd., which held that the provisions of sections 36(1)(vii) and 36(1)(viia) are distinct and independent.

6. Depreciation on Securities: The Tribunal allowed the claim of depreciation on securities, following the precedent in the assessee's own case, where it was held that unrealized gains on stock are not taxable.

7. Deduction under Section 36(1)(viia) for Standard Assets: The Tribunal allowed the deduction for provisions on standard assets, following the decision in the assessee's own case for the assessment year 2006-07, where it was held that the provision for standard assets is also for bad and doubtful debts.

8. Taxation of Interest on NPAs: The Tribunal deleted the addition made by the AO, following the Bombay High Court's decision in the case of American Express Bank Ltd., where it was held that interest on NPAs is taxable only when credited to the profit and loss account or received.

9. Taxation of NPIs: The Tribunal deleted the addition of interest income from NPIs, following the Supreme Court's decision in the case of Vasisth Chay Vyapar Ltd., which held that interest on NPIs is not taxable.

10. Contribution to Retired Employees Medical Benefit Scheme: The Tribunal allowed the contribution, following the precedent in the assessee's own case, where it was held that the contribution was not hit by section 40A(9).

11. Double Taxation Relief: The issue was remanded to the AO for de novo adjudication, as per the provisions of the Act and the applicable tax treaty.

12. Payment for Setting Up a Chair in LSE: The issue was remanded to the AO for de novo adjudication after considering additional evidence submitted by the assessee.

13. Recovery of Bad Debts Written Off in Earlier Years: The Tribunal restored the issue to the AO to verify if the recovery is in respect of a write-off claimed under section 36(1)(viia) or 36(1)(vii).

14. Non-Taxability of Income from Foreign Branches: The Tribunal dismissed the ground, following the decision in Technimont (P.) Ltd., which considered the applicability of Notification no. 91 of 2008.

15. Taxability of Interest on Securities: The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, following the precedent in the assessee's own case, where interest on securities was taxed on a due basis.

16. Allowability of Broken Period Interest: The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, following the precedent in the assessee's own case, where broken period interest was allowed as revenue expenditure.

17. Allowability of Provision for Wage Revision: The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, following the precedent in the assessee's own case, where the provision for wage revision was allowed as a deduction.

18. Allowance of Staff Welfare Expenses: The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, following the precedent in the assessee's own case, where staff welfare expenses were allowed as revenue expenditure.

19. Disallowance under Section 14A r/w Rule 8D: The Tribunal directed the AO to consider only those investments which yielded exempt income during the year for computing disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(iii).

20. Loss on Revaluation of Investments in HTM Category: The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, following the precedent in the assessee's own case, where amortisation of premium on HTM securities was allowed.

21. Allowance of Depreciation on Foreign Assets: The issue was remanded to the AO for de novo adjudication after verifying the details filed by the assessee.

22. Set Off of Loss of Erstwhile State Bank of Saurashtra: The issue was remanded to the AO to allow the benefit of set-off of loss determined in the case of State Bank of Saurashtra.

23. Discount on Employee Stock Purchase Scheme: The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, following the Special Bench decision in Biocon Ltd., where the discount on ESPS was allowed as a deduction.

---